Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spinward Marches Sector"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Notes (2019) == | == Notes (2019) == | ||
| − | + | # [[Spinward Marches Sector]] | |
| − | + | ## [[Cronor | |
| − | + | ## [[Jewell | |
| − | + | ## [[Regina | |
| − | + | ## [[Aramis | |
| − | + | ## [[Querion | |
| − | + | ## [[Vilis | |
| − | + | ## [[Lanth | |
| − | + | ## [[Rhylanor | |
| − | + | ## [[Darrian | |
| − | + | ## [[Sword Worlds | |
| − | + | ## [[Lunion | |
| − | + | ## [[Mora | |
| − | + | ## [[Five Sisters | |
| − | + | ## [[Glisten | |
| − | + | ## [[Trin's Veil | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Notes (2017) == | == Notes (2017) == | ||
Revision as of 21:40, 23 May 2019
Notes (2019)
- Spinward Marches Sector
- [[Cronor
- [[Jewell
- [[Regina
- [[Aramis
- [[Querion
- [[Vilis
- [[Lanth
- [[Rhylanor
- [[Darrian
- [[Sword Worlds
- [[Lunion
- [[Mora
- [[Five Sisters
- [[Glisten
- [[Trin's Veil
Notes (2017)
If possible, Thomas AKA Tjoneslo, please try to capture the non-canon and unnamed sophonts as well.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 11:04, 4 February 2017 (EST)
- The new Template:SectorSophonts is run off a query from the Template:SophontData. If the sophonts don't appear in the list it is because the article either does not exist or is a placeholder which needs to be completed. Tjoneslo (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2017 (EST)
- Thanks for your reply.
- I guess I better put it on my list to update all of the entries to SophontData then. LOL ;-)
- Thanks again!
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 21:26, 4 February 2017 (EST)
Notes (2016)
- The baseline Spinward Marches Sector page is current undergoing experimentation as the Trav Wiki Team experiments with different ways of organizing the information.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 09:27, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
- A disambiguation world listing previously existed on this page.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2016 (EDT)
Old Materials (2016)
External Link: Traveller Atlas
The Spinward Marches sector is not only a frontier, it is a war torn frontier. The Imperium expanded unclaimed territory until it reached the Marches, but there it found other races already in place. Most of the races were inconsequential, but the Zhodani had an empire nearly as large and as powerful as the Imperium. They were a force to be reckoned with; they resisted the Imperial advance and created the atmosphere of contention and conflict.
- The Spinward edge of the Imperium is 130 parsecs from the Emperor's throne on Capital. Beyond that border lie many worlds; some are client-states of the Imperium, while others are independent non-aligned governments.
- True development of the Spinward Marches began with the arrival of the Imperials in 60 when Mora (3124) was settled; Regina (1910) was settled in 75. Between 200 and 400, the major Imperial exploration and settlement of the Marches took place. By 500, there were Imperial explorations beyond the Marches and into Zhodani territory in the adjacent Foreven (Iakr) sector.
- The relationship between the Zhodani Consulate and the Imperium has never been an easy one. The continuing history of frontier wars between two empires makes another war both possible and probable.
- There are ample signs of tension between the Imperium and the Consulate. The Zhodani supported guerrilla insurgency on Efate, Zhodani military preparations which have resulted in Imperial registered ships being fired on, boarded or destroyed, both sides have established trade restrictions on the other side's commodities.
- The sector capital is Mora 0704 AA99AC7-F Hi In
The Extra World (2016)
- The official count of worlds in the Spinward Marches is 439. The world listing shows 440. The difference is Ayoreldold. This is a "Ghost World" which shows up in some canon references but not others. The metadata for the world has the complete discussion of the source(s) of the confusion.
- - Tjoneslo (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2016 (EDT)
