Template talk:UWPRed
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I was working on this one. My problem was the color of the red bar and the red (missing article) links. The problem I had was the red links would disappear against red background. Which is bad, but I had not finished looking through all the possible red colors. Tjoneslo 23:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- For an example see Vard (world), the subsector name is all but unreadable. Tjoneslo 00:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- What about changing the text colour, can you change the links just for that section? Dcorrin 13:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Doing this requires a CSS hack, for which I'll need to research. Tjoneslo 17:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- This brings to mind the issue about the dates used throughout the library. For instance the travel zone rating as per TNS 198-1119 Mora / Mora / Spinward Marches changes the rating from amber to red (for a solar flare in this case on an un-linked world)).
- What about users that wish to use the library data for an Interstellar Wars period campaign... some of information within this library is not widely known during that particular epoch.
- How should we handle this, if at all?
- Sstefan
- I think we discussed this elsewhere. The wiki here does not have any state type information where one could indicate that they want to use the wiki at year 1108 (for example), and articles or parts of articles after 1108 are not available, also for the GM articles. I was thinking that perhaps future developments, or moving to another wiki with this extra support sometime in the future might be viable (e.g. when you log in your viewing year is a parameter of the account), but for any such system to work we would need to have some date tags/categories/something in the articles. Some of the articles are presented in two sections a pre-rebellion and post-rebellion (e.g. Strephon, however without a mechanism we don't know how it might be handled in the future. If you know of an article that is only valid after a certain year, you could always put a extra category, e.g. valid_1119+ or valid_0-1108 etc. Dcorrin 13:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Moved to Talk: Main Page Tjoneslo 15:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think we discussed this elsewhere. The wiki here does not have any state type information where one could indicate that they want to use the wiki at year 1108 (for example), and articles or parts of articles after 1108 are not available, also for the GM articles. I was thinking that perhaps future developments, or moving to another wiki with this extra support sometime in the future might be viable (e.g. when you log in your viewing year is a parameter of the account), but for any such system to work we would need to have some date tags/categories/something in the articles. Some of the articles are presented in two sections a pre-rebellion and post-rebellion (e.g. Strephon, however without a mechanism we don't know how it might be handled in the future. If you know of an article that is only valid after a certain year, you could always put a extra category, e.g. valid_1119+ or valid_0-1108 etc. Dcorrin 13:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
New UWP era, redated Classic Trav era for the UWP[edit]
I added the Solomani Rim War/Traveller20 to possible UWP eras, and redated the Classic era from 1120 to 1115, to avoid controversy. Travalv 19:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)