Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sectors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Consolidated Sectors List) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is there this topic and the "Sector" topic? I suggest combining the two. | Why is there this topic and the "Sector" topic? I suggest combining the two. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Consolidated Sectors List == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I found a copy of the [http://traveller.mu.org/archive/General/Sector.List.txt Consolidated Sector List]. The names in this list not in our list are primarlly HIWG names to "finish the square". This compromises a square about 12 by 18 sectors or 480 by 576 parsecs. Question was did we want to mark the "non-canon" sector names in the list or just have the sectorst themsevles in the non-canon and HIWG categories? [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] 19:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 17 August 2006
Why is there this topic and the "Sector" topic? I suggest combining the two.
Consolidated Sectors List
I found a copy of the Consolidated Sector List. The names in this list not in our list are primarlly HIWG names to "finish the square". This compromises a square about 12 by 18 sectors or 480 by 576 parsecs. Question was did we want to mark the "non-canon" sector names in the list or just have the sectorst themsevles in the non-canon and HIWG categories? Tjoneslo 19:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)