Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eneri Calavan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As the successful commander of the siege, he would have (presumably) been awarded some form of {{Imperial}} honour. Options include: | As the successful commander of the siege, he would have (presumably) been awarded some form of {{Imperial}} honour. Options include: | ||
| − | * Promotion to [[Sector Marshal (IA)|Sector Marshal]] - Politically tricky as that was in the control of the [[Duchess of Mora]] | + | * Promotion to [[Sector Marshal (IA)|Sector Marshal]] - Politically tricky as that was in the control of the [[Duchy of Mora|Duchess of Mora]] |
* [[MCUF]] - The army option | * [[MCUF]] - The army option | ||
* If not a [[Baron]] previously, he must have been made a [[Baron]] on becoming [[Vice Marshal]] | * If not a [[Baron]] previously, he must have been made a [[Baron]] on becoming [[Vice Marshal]] | ||
Revision as of 10:15, 30 June 2021
To have been appointed, he must have been acceptable to the Duke of Regina - And to have worked effectively on Efate he must have been acceptable to the Duchess of Efate. That makes him something of a politician.
To have commanded personally at Efate during the Siege of Efate would have hampered the effective administration of the Imperial Army in the Regina Subsector.
As the successful commander of the siege, he would have (presumably) been awarded some form of Imperial honour. Options include:
- Promotion to Sector Marshal - Politically tricky as that was in the control of the Duchess of Mora
- MCUF - The army option
- If not a Baron previously, he must have been made a Baron on becoming Vice Marshal
BackworldTraveller (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2021 (EDT)