Difference between revisions of "Forum:Citation cleanup"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add another section, sign my work) |
(Question) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===broken references upon transclusion=== | ===broken references upon transclusion=== | ||
I am not sure how to fix these reference errors. Perhaps the page itself needs a redesign. See [[Goods/Protective gear]]. Guidance? [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 11:02, 12 June 2020 (EDT) | I am not sure how to fix these reference errors. Perhaps the page itself needs a redesign. See [[Goods/Protective gear]]. Guidance? [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 11:02, 12 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Freelance Traveller (magazine) issues=== | ||
| + | I have found citations for Freelance Traveller magazine issues. We do not have them in the ludography. Is there a reason we should not add them? [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 11:28, 12 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 12 June 2020
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Citation cleanup
internal references
I started cleanup of Category:Citation Missing and encountered 3277th Imperial Marine Regiment. It is using a {{Page cite|...}} to cite another wiki page. In this case the article references 1115. I think the use case is valid: Cite another wiki page.
- Do we have such a cite template?
- Should we
- just use <ref>[[1115]]</ref>?
- Disallow this kind of reference?
- Something else?
—¿philoserf? (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
broken references upon transclusion
I am not sure how to fix these reference errors. Perhaps the page itself needs a redesign. See Goods/Protective gear. Guidance? —¿philoserf? (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
Freelance Traveller (magazine) issues
I have found citations for Freelance Traveller magazine issues. We do not have them in the ludography. Is there a reason we should not add them? —¿philoserf? (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2020 (EDT)