Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited liability Imperial Charter/secret"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Now that we've found out how to make hidden bits of text (I use 'we' very loosely, of course ;-), is it really necessary to have separate pages for secrets? ~~~~ Incidentally, this isn't ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Now that we've found out how to make hidden bits of text (I use 'we' very loosely, of course ;-), is it really necessary to have separate pages for secrets? [[User: | + | Now that we've found out how to make hidden bits of text (I use 'we' very loosely, of course ;-), is it really necessary to have separate pages for secrets? [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
| − | Incidentally, this isn't really a secret, now that I think about it, just stuff that wouldn't appear in a formal library data article (Or so it seems to me). Perhaps I should have chosen a different label. Unofficial information? Common knowledge? Anyone have any opinions and/or ideas about that? [[User: | + | Incidentally, this isn't really a secret, now that I think about it, just stuff that wouldn't appear in a formal library data article (Or so it seems to me). Perhaps I should have chosen a different label. Unofficial information? Common knowledge? Anyone have any opinions and/or ideas about that? [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:33, 14 September 2007
Now that we've found out how to make hidden bits of text (I use 'we' very loosely, of course ;-), is it really necessary to have separate pages for secrets? Rancke 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Incidentally, this isn't really a secret, now that I think about it, just stuff that wouldn't appear in a formal library data article (Or so it seems to me). Perhaps I should have chosen a different label. Unofficial information? Common knowledge? Anyone have any opinions and/or ideas about that? Rancke 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)