Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starport"

From Traveller Wiki - Science-Fiction Adventure in the Far future
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
== Notes (2006) ==
 
It is still a contrivance, there is no way in the extended system to show a UWP for the non-main planet with a spaceport(starport) with an Overhaul capability or construction capability.
 
It is still a contrivance, there is no way in the extended system to show a UWP for the non-main planet with a spaceport(starport) with an Overhaul capability or construction capability.
  
Line 18: Line 20:
 
E = Class I
 
E = Class I
  
 +
== Notes (2007) ==
 
Yup that's true, but I suspect that MWM's canon answer will be that Starport type relates directly to the Starport of the mainworld. Is it worth adding the G:T Starport types to the page, or will that step on SJG's toes and cause us problems? [[User:Gruffty|Gruffty]] 10:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 
Yup that's true, but I suspect that MWM's canon answer will be that Starport type relates directly to the Starport of the mainworld. Is it worth adding the G:T Starport types to the page, or will that step on SJG's toes and cause us problems? [[User:Gruffty|Gruffty]] 10:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Notes (2017) ==
 +
TBD

Revision as of 19:53, 12 March 2017

Notes (2006)

It is still a contrivance, there is no way in the extended system to show a UWP for the non-main planet with a spaceport(starport) with an Overhaul capability or construction capability.

There needs to be codes for better spaceports within a system.

Dcorrin 18:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


GURPS Equivalents

A = Class V

B = Class IV

C = Class III

D = Class II

E = Class I

Notes (2007)

Yup that's true, but I suspect that MWM's canon answer will be that Starport type relates directly to the Starport of the mainworld. Is it worth adding the G:T Starport types to the page, or will that step on SJG's toes and cause us problems? Gruffty 10:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Notes (2017)

TBD