Talk:Knoellighz Sector/layout data

Notes (2016)

• Was forced to correct Knoellighz 1612. It had, under Mongoose, an illegal UWP of A667005-C. While the TL can be rolled, the rule of 0 Population, 0 Government and 0 Law equals 0 Tech Level. The world is claimed by Democracy of Greats (Vd or VDoG) but as a frontier Garden world, it has yet to be fully surveyed, scouted, explored, pioneered, colonized or settled as of 1105. Unless the planet is inhabited by colonization robots from a Ht, nearby world, (and there isn't one within 2 parsecs); I corrected it to A667000-0. -Pakkrat 01/18/2016
• Corrected Knoellighz 0430. Same illegal UWP similar to above. -Pakkrat 1/18/2016
• Corrected Knoellighz 1726, adding In Trade Code as the world has UWP of A5009ED-C. Mongoose says it also has In code. -Pakkrat 1/18/2016
• Corrected Knoellighz 2302, for illegal Tech Level rating. A577000-C to A577000-0. This world's Starport A must be far outsystem from the mainworld.
• Corrected 1804 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Corrected 0417 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Corrected 0605 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Corrected 0815 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Corrected 2801 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Corrected 0114 for same above reason of illegal TL code. Barren = 0 TL.
• Added subsector Capitals (Cx) for each subsector. Note that more than one Capitals are non-Aligned by UWP default merit rather than by polity.
• Observation: worlds with Ba and thus 0 TL and yet have better than X Starport must indicate that the world is under colonization and that new arrivals have constructed Highports before truly landing start-up colony assets planetside. -Pakkrat 01/27/2016
• With these many corrections due to Barren, Failing or Doomed worlds, it must remembered that Knoellighz Sector is a frontier edge of Known Space and that the Vargr Extents polities and non-aligned, pioneering attempts will make plenty of mistakes in their Coreward expansion.

---

According to the original generation of worlds based on the V&V dotmap, many worlds have only one or more Dwarf stars as the primary or primary and secondary. How should these be listed if such are legal worlds according to stellar generation? Should the primary Dwarf be changed to a different star?

• Pakkrat 02/12/2016

My suggestion would be to change the classification of the primary from "D" to "V". Though, systems with only dwarf stars are possible, but only with vacuum worlds (not enough heat to maintain liquid water).

• 77topaz (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2016 (EST)

---

Do any of the rules versions allow for L (very dark Red Dwarf), T (Brown Dwarf), Y (very rare Brown Dwarf), or C-R (carbon stars) as primaries or captured stellar bodies?

• The Pakkrat (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2016 (EDT)

---

Also, subsector capitals should be "Cp". "Cx" is for polity capitals.

• 77topaz (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2016 (EST)

---

Additionally, those UWPs that are illegal under Mongoose are legal under T5. They're called "Dieback" worlds.

• 77topaz (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2016 (EST)

---