Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gaalorn Subsector"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Garnfellow (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: This is called a mistake. It should be brought to Don's attention on the COTI boards (either the T5 board or via PM). I would guess that is was the subsector capital when the Imperium owned the whole of the subsector, and the map never updated. The Solomani may still use the infrastructure. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 08:14, 18 November 2013 (EST) | : This is called a mistake. It should be brought to Don's attention on the COTI boards (either the T5 board or via PM). I would guess that is was the subsector capital when the Imperium owned the whole of the subsector, and the map never updated. The Solomani may still use the infrastructure. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 08:14, 18 November 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I'll do that -- there are a handful of weird cases throughout the T5 data. A couple of subsectors with multiple capitals, many without any, etc. [[User:Garnfellow|Garnfellow]] ([[User talk:Garnfellow|talk]]) 08:49, 18 November 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 18 November 2013
Harp is listed in the T5 Second Survey data has being the subsector capital, but that's a Solomani world and the Confederation doesn't generally administrate through subsector capitals.
- This is called a mistake. It should be brought to Don's attention on the COTI boards (either the T5 board or via PM). I would guess that is was the subsector capital when the Imperium owned the whole of the subsector, and the map never updated. The Solomani may still use the infrastructure. Tjoneslo (talk) 08:14, 18 November 2013 (EST)
- I'll do that -- there are a handful of weird cases throughout the T5 data. A couple of subsectors with multiple capitals, many without any, etc. Garnfellow (talk) 08:49, 18 November 2013 (EST)