Difference between revisions of "Cruiser/meta"
< Cruiser
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The general consensus is that a cruiser is mid to high-level combatant somewhere in this spectrum: <br> | The general consensus is that a cruiser is mid to high-level combatant somewhere in this spectrum: <br> | ||
[[Escort]] → [[Destroyer]] → [[Cruiser]] → [[Battleship]] / [[Dreadnought]] | [[Escort]] → [[Destroyer]] → [[Cruiser]] → [[Battleship]] / [[Dreadnought]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | But after those base assumptions, it really begins to break down. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Keith Brothers]] designed the vast majority of their ships in the 100 to 100,000 [[ton]] range. And I mean everything from the smallest [[scout vessel]] to the largest [[battleship]]s. There are exceptions of course, but most of their material kept within those tonnage bounds. | ||
: - [[User:Maksim-Smelchak|Maksim-Smelchak]] ([[User talk:Maksim-Smelchak|talk]]) 09:12, 10 September 2019 (EDT) | : - [[User:Maksim-Smelchak|Maksim-Smelchak]] ([[User talk:Maksim-Smelchak|talk]]) 09:12, 10 September 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 10 September 2019
So Many Cruisers! (2019)
What is a cruiser? Good question.
The general consensus is that a cruiser is mid to high-level combatant somewhere in this spectrum:
Escort → Destroyer → Cruiser → Battleship / Dreadnought
But after those base assumptions, it really begins to break down.
The Keith Brothers designed the vast majority of their ships in the 100 to 100,000 ton range. And I mean everything from the smallest scout vessel to the largest battleships. There are exceptions of course, but most of their material kept within those tonnage bounds.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2019 (EDT)