Difference between revisions of "Forum:Second Survey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> == Second Survey discussion (2016) == What a c...") |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# What should happen to valid data that does not mesh with TravellerMap? | # What should happen to valid data that does not mesh with TravellerMap? | ||
# I've marked multiple Beyond Sector related links for deletion; should I undo them? | # I've marked multiple Beyond Sector related links for deletion; should I undo them? | ||
| − | # Should we differentiate the "no longer valid data per TravellerMap as I did for [[Northstar (world)]]? | + | # Should we differentiate the ''"no longer valid data per TravellerMap"'' as I did for [[Northstar (world)]]? |
[[User:Ssteve|Ssteve]] ([[User talk:Ssteve|talk]]) 22:29, 26 February 2016 (EST) | [[User:Ssteve|Ssteve]] ([[User talk:Ssteve|talk]]) 22:29, 26 February 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:29, 27 February 2016
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Second Survey
Second Survey discussion (2016)
What a can of worms..
I've been digging (part of the job description of a minion) up data for Beyond Sector, and found loads of issues here in the Wiki; so here is a bunch of questions
- Should we base our astrographic data purely on T5 Second survey data as shown on TravellerMap?
- What should happen to valid data that does not mesh with TravellerMap?
- I've marked multiple Beyond Sector related links for deletion; should I undo them?
- Should we differentiate the "no longer valid data per TravellerMap" as I did for Northstar (world)?