Difference between revisions of "Template talk:New releases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/forumdisplay.php?f=124 COTI TAS feed] | *[http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/forumdisplay.php?f=124 COTI TAS feed] | ||
*[https://www.reddit.com/r/traveller/ r/Traveller] | *[https://www.reddit.com/r/traveller/ r/Traveller] | ||
| − | - … | + | - [https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse.php?filters=10134_0_0_0_0&src=fid10134 New section at DriveThruRPG] |
| + | -… | ||
[[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 21:20, 12 August 2021 (EDT) | [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 21:20, 12 August 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 14 January 2022
new release sources
- New section at DriveThruRPG -… —¿philoserf? (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2021 (EDT)
standard format
i propose this styling standard for new release items.
* mm.dd {{!}} [https://example.com/product Product] from [[Publisher]]
i am considering a template to make it easy.
template:
* {{{1}}} {{!}} [{{{2}}} {{{3}}}] from [[{{{4}}}]]
usage:
{{newrel|08.13|https://example.com/product|Product|Publisher}}
- i created the Template:Release to use with New releases this year—¿philoserf? (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2022 (EST)
Move request
Can we please move this to New releases. It is a content page and the <noinclude> will still work. —¿philoserf? (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2022 (EST)