Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spinward Marches Sector/data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thomas, why on Earth did you replace the old social data with this new economic data? Why didn't you make a new page for that and leave the old data intact? I strongly suggest that you move the economic data to a new page and restore the old data. [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] ([[User talk:Rancke|talk]]) 05:58, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | Thomas, why on Earth did you replace the old social data with this new economic data? Why didn't you make a new page for that and leave the old data intact? I strongly suggest that you move the economic data to a new page and restore the old data. [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] ([[User talk:Rancke|talk]]) 05:58, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
: You mean [http://travellermap.com/api/sec?sector=Spinward%20Marches&type=SecondSurvey this data]? One of the changes made in the new version of the Trade Map generator is that it pulls this data directly from the Traveller Map site. Because the Traveller Maps is now the one true source of steller data. So I felt that having a copy of the data, which may be out of date, in the wiki was not useful. I have an update to the data files to include a direct link to the Traveller Map data, but am waiting for an T5SS review of some new sectors to be completed. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 09:00, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | : You mean [http://travellermap.com/api/sec?sector=Spinward%20Marches&type=SecondSurvey this data]? One of the changes made in the new version of the Trade Map generator is that it pulls this data directly from the Traveller Map site. Because the Traveller Maps is now the one true source of steller data. So I felt that having a copy of the data, which may be out of date, in the wiki was not useful. I have an update to the data files to include a direct link to the Traveller Map data, but am waiting for an T5SS review of some new sectors to be completed. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 09:00, 24 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::That's fine, but why not put the new data in a new file and keep the old data in the old file? I've been making subsector data files for a number of subsectors, and they are all in <subsector>/data not <subsector>/SecondSurvey. On top of that, Second Survey is misleading as it implies UWPs for 1065 when what we're aiming for on the wiki is UWPs for 1115. So why not keep the old data in /data and put the new data in /economic or something like that? [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] ([[User talk:Rancke|talk]]) 02:31, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:31, 25 August 2014
Thomas, why on Earth did you replace the old social data with this new economic data? Why didn't you make a new page for that and leave the old data intact? I strongly suggest that you move the economic data to a new page and restore the old data. Rancke (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2014 (EDT)
- You mean this data? One of the changes made in the new version of the Trade Map generator is that it pulls this data directly from the Traveller Map site. Because the Traveller Maps is now the one true source of steller data. So I felt that having a copy of the data, which may be out of date, in the wiki was not useful. I have an update to the data files to include a direct link to the Traveller Map data, but am waiting for an T5SS review of some new sectors to be completed. Tjoneslo (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2014 (EDT)
- That's fine, but why not put the new data in a new file and keep the old data in the old file? I've been making subsector data files for a number of subsectors, and they are all in <subsector>/data not <subsector>/SecondSurvey. On top of that, Second Survey is misleading as it implies UWPs for 1065 when what we're aiming for on the wiki is UWPs for 1115. So why not keep the old data in /data and put the new data in /economic or something like that? Rancke (talk) 02:31, 25 August 2014 (EDT)