Talk:Orbital Zone
Links (2019)
- EXTERNAL LINK: Little bit of the system generation setup..
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2019 (EDT)
Notes (2019)
Hey I'm trying to work here and you are stepping on me...
- - Willbo
Sorry. Thought you were done.
- Will check back in later.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 18:17, 10 October 2019 (EDT)
You have my cell.
- If not, contact me at CotI.
- Text if you are going to spend a long time on a project.
- Otherwise I have bots set up to do many edits and they move very quickly.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2019 (EDT)
Thank you, sir.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
Its ok I'm done for the moment... looks like there may be errors in the data with regards to the Gravitic Drive limit. The O and B stars do not have standard stars to use for comparison on several of the sizes so I had to guess a bit. I bet Marc, et al, had to do the same at one point... -Willbo 23:15 10 October 2019 (EDT)
OK the page is mostly ready now. I had to run some calcs off of book 6 and then go looking for data for the Type O stars. the Giants (Size III) table might still be off with the first one or two rows. -Willbo 00:45 11 October 2019 (EDT)
Done! the Class O0 and O5 stars have been cleaned up I found a good source for the data as references on the page.
- - Willbo 08:47 11 October 2019
Thank you.
- - Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 08:48, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
Working on the size IaO table, realised that pink is better for a background than red. so I'll work on fixing that as well. -Willbo 13:11, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
Notes 2020
Fixed up a few errors and added in the values H- and H+ for compatibility with T5. -Willbo 17:50, 30 January 2020 (EDT)
Notes 2021
Discovered that I had miscalculated the stellar sizes for the IaO table. I used diameters for their size instead of radius. However, this does not effect the habitable zone or any of the other entries. just makes the Inner zones a little bit bigger. -Willbo 21:20 3 January 2021 (EDT)