Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Kieran O'Connor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Since this is non-canon I would have no problem assuming there were two TMCs, one formed in -2113 which later collapsed (say around -2060) in the economic turmoil of the rule [[Majid Al-Mansur Al-Akbar Khalify|Emperor Majid]], and the second (and more important one) (re)forming in -1862. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 08:27, 6 April 2013 (EDT) | : Since this is non-canon I would have no problem assuming there were two TMCs, one formed in -2113 which later collapsed (say around -2060) in the economic turmoil of the rule [[Majid Al-Mansur Al-Akbar Khalify|Emperor Majid]], and the second (and more important one) (re)forming in -1862. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 08:27, 6 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Then the link should be to the earlier TMC, not the canonical one. [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] ([[User talk:Rancke|talk]]) 11:45, 6 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:45, 6 April 2013
The whole bit about the Terran Mercantile Community is contrary to canon. The TMC was formed in -1862, two and a half centuries later. It should be removed or changed to something else. Rancke (talk) 07:11, 6 April 2013 (EDT)
- Since this is non-canon I would have no problem assuming there were two TMCs, one formed in -2113 which later collapsed (say around -2060) in the economic turmoil of the rule Emperor Majid, and the second (and more important one) (re)forming in -1862. Tjoneslo (talk) 08:27, 6 April 2013 (EDT)