Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imperial Navy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WHULorigan (talk | contribs) m |
WHULorigan (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | : '''Note''': The Ranks of '''Rear Admiral''' and '''Vice-Admiral''' are explicitly mentioned in TNS News Briefs for the years: [[TNS_1106|1106]], [[TNS_1107|1107]], [[TNS_1108|1108]], [[TNS_1109|1109]], [[TNS_1110|1110]]. | + | : '''Note''': The Ranks of '''Rear Admiral''' and '''Vice-Admiral''' are explicitly mentioned in TNS News Briefs for the years: [[TNS_1106|1106]], [[TNS_1107|1107]], [[TNS_1108|1108]], [[TNS_1109|1109]], [[TNS_1110|1110]], [[TNS_1111|1111]]. |
:* --[[User:WHULorigan|WHULorigan]] ([[User talk:WHULorigan|talk]]) 22:27, 4 April 2016 (EDT) | :* --[[User:WHULorigan|WHULorigan]] ([[User talk:WHULorigan|talk]]) 22:27, 4 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 4 November 2016
Notes (2016)
I made some edits to the Flag Ranks in the Imperial Navy Ranks Table. There is precedent in both CT (JTAS) TNS-Releases and some of the online discussion on GT:JTAS for the ranks of Rear Admiral and Vice-Admiral as "subranks" of Fleet Admiral. Vice-Admiral is actually mentioned explicitly at least once in CT:JTAS-TNS (I don't remember where). The Imperial Navy is large enough (and Imperium-wide) to justify the upper level Flag Ranks. The Fleet Ranks ("Rear-", "Vice-", and "Fleet-") for actual fighting-fleet commands and Admiralty-Staff appointments, and the "Sector-" and "Grand-" Ranks for the political-level appointments. It also puts the Navy on a par with the Army which has the O11 "Field Marshal" Rank.
- --WHULorigan (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2016 (EDT)