Difference between revisions of "Talk:141st Fleet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | You are correct. | + | == Notes (2014) == |
| + | Both the 141st, a regular Imperial Navy fleet, and a locally raised subsector fleet would consists predominantly of [[TL-15]] combatants. The 141st because the Imperial Navy gets its ships built anywhere and a subsector fleet because it can get its ships built at any shipyard in the subsector, including Theron (0937 A100979-F). (Auxiliaries like tankers and transport ships could be built at lower TLs, provided there was shipyard capacity to build them.) | ||
| + | : - [[User:Rancke|Rancke]] ([[User talk:Rancke|talk]]) 12:44, 4 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | You are correct. You make an excellent point. I am glad you pointed this out. I am sorry for my mistake. Can we find me a colonial fleet to monkey with? I will withdraw this tinkering. There must be a backwater nock or crany where a few old warhorses might still graze... | ||
| + | : - Ron | ||
Latest revision as of 09:13, 5 October 2018
Notes (2014)[edit]
Both the 141st, a regular Imperial Navy fleet, and a locally raised subsector fleet would consists predominantly of TL-15 combatants. The 141st because the Imperial Navy gets its ships built anywhere and a subsector fleet because it can get its ships built at any shipyard in the subsector, including Theron (0937 A100979-F). (Auxiliaries like tankers and transport ships could be built at lower TLs, provided there was shipyard capacity to build them.)
You are correct. You make an excellent point. I am glad you pointed this out. I am sorry for my mistake. Can we find me a colonial fleet to monkey with? I will withdraw this tinkering. There must be a backwater nock or crany where a few old warhorses might still graze...
- - Ron