Difference between revisions of "Interdiction"
m (Fixed IISS reference) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
or sensitive culture from the interference that trade and commerce will bring. The Navy is held to be more vindictive in its recommendations, using interdiction to punish local governments or to hide its own mistakes. | or sensitive culture from the interference that trade and commerce will bring. The Navy is held to be more vindictive in its recommendations, using interdiction to punish local governments or to hide its own mistakes. | ||
| − | Interdicted worlds are awarded travel zone red ratings by the [[Travellers Aid Society]]. See also [[Red Zone]]. | + | Interdicted worlds are awarded travel zone red ratings by the [[Travellers' Aid Society]]. See also [[Red Zone]]. |
- Source: Supplement 8 Library Data (A-M) | - Source: Supplement 8 Library Data (A-M) | ||
Revision as of 11:39, 1 March 2006
The Imperial practice of interdiction of worlds within the boundaries of the Imperium had long been a source of contention between liberal and conservative factions in the government. Interdictions must be approved by a member of the Imperial family, but generally such approval is given in response to a request from an interested service, almost always the Scouts or the Navy.
It is generally held that the Scouts recommend interdiction to shield a young or sensitive culture from the interference that trade and commerce will bring. The Navy is held to be more vindictive in its recommendations, using interdiction to punish local governments or to hide its own mistakes.
Interdicted worlds are awarded travel zone red ratings by the Travellers' Aid Society. See also Red Zone.
- Source: Supplement 8 Library Data (A-M)
Non-Canon
Feel free to enter further information and/or personal experiences with this astronavigational obstacle.