Difference between revisions of "Forum:Traveller RPG Wiki vs Imperial Encyclopedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Comment) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I recommend we find instances of the first and replace it with the second. [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 01:58, 16 June 2020 (EDT) | I recommend we find instances of the first and replace it with the second. [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 01:58, 16 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : There are two different use cases here. For the Metadata pages (e.g. [[Copyright]], the project name space) the reference to [[Traveller RPG Wiki]] is the root reference the wiki policies. For references in the Library (i.e. in-game references), the the link should be to [[Argushiigi Admegulasha Bilanidin]]. For the latter, I agree we should have a consistent name. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 06:50, 16 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:50, 16 June 2020
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Traveller RPG Wiki vs Imperial Encyclopedia
I recommend we find instances of the first and replace it with the second. —¿philoserf? (talk) 01:58, 16 June 2020 (EDT)
- There are two different use cases here. For the Metadata pages (e.g. Copyright, the project name space) the reference to Traveller RPG Wiki is the root reference the wiki policies. For references in the Library (i.e. in-game references), the the link should be to Argushiigi Admegulasha Bilanidin. For the latter, I agree we should have a consistent name. Tjoneslo (talk) 06:50, 16 June 2020 (EDT)