Forum:Referral tree templates

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Referral tree templates

Template Namespace

I recommend moving these to template namespace if there is no reason to keep them in main namespace. Category:Referral trees —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2020 (EDT)

Short answer is yes, I would also recommend the same. Longer answer is the contents of those articles need review. User:BackworldTraveller came up with adding the hidden template to make sure the referral trees don't dominate the articles. I recommend moving them to the bottom of the article under a "See also" header so they don't dominate the articles. The list of articles needs to be reviewed and edited, as I've found as many of half of the entries are redirect links to articles. The Referral list articles, which are a list of similar types of vehicles/starships, could be replaced with a template generating entries from a common category or template entry. It's a task that needs to be done and thank you for considering do this. Tjoneslo (talk) 06:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT)

I agree about moving to a See also section. Perhaps just above Sources. A Wikipedia like bottom of the page navigation box seems right for the biggest trees too. I will have to look more closely at the content and use. —¿philoserf? (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2020 (EDT)

I'd agree that the contents need review. I'd suggest that the links to redirects is a side-effect of continual changes of mind about categorisation. If a particular tree can be agreed, then migrating to that tree's pertinent pages would be a job in itself. I also agree that a common namespace is good...but would it be worth using a name other than Template or is that some hard-coded prefix? If that is possible, the names space Xref or QV or Tree maybe? BackworldTraveller (talk) 09:00, 17 June 2020 (EDT)

p.s. At the end is probably better as the "Show" box of the hidden list tends to get tangled in the info boxes when at the top of the pageBackworldTraveller (talk)

See Traveller:Namespaces, the prefix / namespace "Template:" has a special meaning and allows for special processing within the wiki. Tjoneslo (talk) 17:54, 17 June 2020 (EDT)

Vehicle Template

Shall I create one and start sorting the pages into that structure?

The current hierarchy is..

• Vehicle
  • Aircraft
  • Exoticraft
  • Gravcraft
  • Groundcraft
  • Spaceplane
  • Primitive Craft
  • Spacecraft
  • Starcraft
  • Watercraft

1. Should it extend to include all transport options (Skis, parachute, grav belt)?
2. Should it also include Railways and Mag-Lev transport systems?
3. How do we want to categorise things like the DUKW (Groundcraft and Watercraft), Hovercraft (Aircraft and watercraft and ground craft), Ecranoplan (Ground Effect Air/Water Vehicle)?
4. Why are Primitive Craft a separate category? The defining difference seems to be that the power supply is "Muscle" as the examples are all actually members of the other categories.
5. The names for categories have been changed in part over time and the old links left as redirects (e.g. Interfacecraft redirects to spaceplane) Should we tidy up?

Things like Skis and parachutes are listed under Personal Mobility (see Category:Personal mobility and Personal Mobility Gear). Please move articles and update the links to add spaces into "exotic craft" and "space plane" and rename "Grav vehicle" and "ground vehicle". Separating the Primitive Craft is done by Tech Level (TL0-3) simply because of the nature of the things. I would leave it that way. If at any time you find the referral trees links going to redirect pages or duplicates, please feel free to clean them up. Tjoneslo (talk) 18:03, 17 June 2020 (EDT)

---

The page Transportation Technologies of Charted Space manages to have two separate hierarchies in the same article!

I'd propose then that the tree looks like (but without the commentary):
Template:Referral-Tree-V-Vehicles

Vehicles

§ == ( Please refer to the following AAB Library Data for more information: ) == §

• Vehicle
  • Aerospace Vessel (new)
    • Aircraft (would include Hovercraft, Helicopters, Propeller Driven Aircraft, Jet driven Aircraft. Explicitly excludes Grav Vehicle)
    • Airship
    • Grav Vehicle (n.b. Currently redirects to Gravcraft - moved in 2018) (Explicitly refers to Spaceplane and Spaceship)
    • Spaceplane (n.b. Currently Space plane redirects to Spaceship - moved in 2019. n.b. Interface Craft redirects to Spaceplane - moved in 2019. Includes Rockets. Explicitly refers to Grav Vehicle)
    • Spaceship (NAFAL) (Explicitly refers to Grav Vehicle and Rocket)
    • Starship (FTL) (Explicitly refers to being a type of Spaceship)
  • Watercraft (currently trivial)
    • Surface Vessel (new)
    • Submarine (n.b. Currently redirects to Watercraft)
  • Land Vehicle (n.b. Currently redirects to Groundcraft - Moved in 2019. Refers to Grav Vehicle)
    • Ground Vehicle (n.b. Currently redirects to Groundcraft - Moved in 2018: to cover "Wheeled Vehicle" (currently redirects to ground craft); "Tracked Vehicle"(currently redirects to ground craft); "Legged Vehicle" (new redirect); "Sledge" (new redirect))
      • Primitive Ground Vehicle (n.b lose the plural in the current page name)
    • Tunnelling Vehicle (New)
  • Exotic Craft (renamed) (n.b. Currently Exoticraft)
  • Multi-Environment Vehicle (new. n.b Amphibian currently redirects to Amphibianoid [animal]; triphibian doesn't exist; Arguably includes Grav Vehicle, Spaceplane, but I'd leave those as Aerospace Vessels)

Is Maksim-Smelchak still involved as it seems to be following (ish) a structure he worked on?

BackworldTraveller (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2020 (EDT)

---

This all looks great. My only request is a small addition of the Personal Mobility Gear. It's not vehicles, quite, mostly. The problem with putting things into boxes is you inevitably find something that doesn't fit into any of the boxes, or too many of them at once. I have not seen nor heard from Maksim in several months. If you want to reach out to him, that would be great. Tjoneslo (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2020 (EDT)