Difference between revisions of "Forum:Referral tree templates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Move?: respond) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Short answer is yes, I would also recommend the same. Longer answer is the contents of those articles need review. [[User:BackworldTraveller]] came up with adding the hidden template to make sure the referral trees don't dominate the articles. I recommend moving them to the bottom of the article under a "See also" header so they don't dominate the articles. The list of articles needs to be reviewed and edited, as I've found as many of half of the entries are redirect links to articles. The Referral list articles, which are a list of similar types of vehicles/starships, could be replaced with a template generating entries from a common category or template entry. It's a task that needs to be done and thank you for considering do this. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 06:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT) | : Short answer is yes, I would also recommend the same. Longer answer is the contents of those articles need review. [[User:BackworldTraveller]] came up with adding the hidden template to make sure the referral trees don't dominate the articles. I recommend moving them to the bottom of the article under a "See also" header so they don't dominate the articles. The list of articles needs to be reviewed and edited, as I've found as many of half of the entries are redirect links to articles. The Referral list articles, which are a list of similar types of vehicles/starships, could be replaced with a template generating entries from a common category or template entry. It's a task that needs to be done and thank you for considering do this. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 06:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I agree about moving to a See also section. Perhaps just above Sources. A Wikipedia like bottom of the page navigation box seems right for the biggest trees too. I will have to look more closely at the content and use. [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 08:20, 17 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:20, 17 June 2020
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Referral tree templates
Move?
I recommend moving these to template namespace if there is no reason to keep them in main namespace. Category:Referral trees —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2020 (EDT)
- Short answer is yes, I would also recommend the same. Longer answer is the contents of those articles need review. User:BackworldTraveller came up with adding the hidden template to make sure the referral trees don't dominate the articles. I recommend moving them to the bottom of the article under a "See also" header so they don't dominate the articles. The list of articles needs to be reviewed and edited, as I've found as many of half of the entries are redirect links to articles. The Referral list articles, which are a list of similar types of vehicles/starships, could be replaced with a template generating entries from a common category or template entry. It's a task that needs to be done and thank you for considering do this. Tjoneslo (talk) 06:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT)
- I agree about moving to a See also section. Perhaps just above Sources. A Wikipedia like bottom of the page navigation box seems right for the biggest trees too. I will have to look more closely at the content and use. —¿philoserf? (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2020 (EDT)