Difference between revisions of "Forum:Page layout templates and formats"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I've seen two discussions regarding the layout...") |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I tend to agree with both of these points. I would like to come to a good agreement about the size and scope of the headers in the article to allow clear delineation of topics without over specification. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 19:56, 27 April 2015 (EDT) | I tend to agree with both of these points. I would like to come to a good agreement about the size and scope of the headers in the article to allow clear delineation of topics without over specification. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 19:56, 27 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Hi [[User:Rancke|Rancke]], I think you make excellent points. I did not act alone and [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] liked some of the layouts I helped pioneer enough to make a template out of them. I am very open to discussion and cooperation s part of the community. Please note that there was and still is discussion. I am not a lone wolf and I am a very reasonable person. Thank you. [[User:Maksim-Smelchak|Maksim-Smelchak]] ([[User talk:Maksim-Smelchak|talk]]) 20:12, 27 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:12, 28 April 2015
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Page layout templates and formats
I've seen two discussions regarding the layout of headers on the article pages:
- First discussion - how/why the sub-headings are done on articles. I've tended to do them however the existing article was marked up, but I don't really understand why each sub-heading includes the full name (and more) of the article. Surely that is redundant information that just adds to the bulk of the page. It also makes it more difficult to use the headings in the "Contents" list as anchors on the page to direct links in from outside as a link could be something like Zhodani#History & Background (which only takes you to the top of the page as the subheading is not complete) but instead would have to be Zhodani#Zhodani (Sophont) History & Background (Dossier)(which will take you to the desired location on the page).
- Second discussion - I don't think it's a good idea to introduce a new article format without discussing it first. I, for one, would not have approved. The basic idea is that we try to keep articles so like actual in-setting library data as we can (subject to various practical limits). The multiple headlines and parentheses makes the articles seem overly busy and quite disquieting to me. It also makes them stylistically different from the 7000 previous articles. Rancke (talk) 21:24, 26 April 2015 (EDT)
I tend to agree with both of these points. I would like to come to a good agreement about the size and scope of the headers in the article to allow clear delineation of topics without over specification. Tjoneslo (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2015 (EDT)
- Hi Rancke, I think you make excellent points. I did not act alone and Tjoneslo liked some of the layouts I helped pioneer enough to make a template out of them. I am very open to discussion and cooperation s part of the community. Please note that there was and still is discussion. I am not a lone wolf and I am a very reasonable person. Thank you. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2015 (EDT)