Difference between revisions of "Forum:Orphans worth saving"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Respond) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: [[Setting]], [[Traveller Ethos]], [[Traveller:What is Traveller?]] also cover similar topics. My recommendation would be (simple) add a <nowiki>{{policies}}</nowiki> template to the Features article and update the template or (complex) rewrite the four articles with better organization about the background and history of the background. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 06:30, 17 June 2020 (EDT) | : [[Setting]], [[Traveller Ethos]], [[Traveller:What is Traveller?]] also cover similar topics. My recommendation would be (simple) add a <nowiki>{{policies}}</nowiki> template to the Features article and update the template or (complex) rewrite the four articles with better organization about the background and history of the background. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 06:30, 17 June 2020 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Yes. Those belong together. Little steps make bigger (complex) jobs smaller (manageable). I’ll start with the policy recommendation. [[User:Philoserf|—¿philoserf?]] ([[User talk:Philoserf|talk]]) 08:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 08:23, 17 June 2020
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Orphans worth saving
Features and category:Features[edit]
These look like they might be worth keeping, improving, and expanding. What say you all? —¿philoserf? (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2020 (EDT)
- Setting, Traveller Ethos, Traveller:What is Traveller? also cover similar topics. My recommendation would be (simple) add a {{policies}} template to the Features article and update the template or (complex) rewrite the four articles with better organization about the background and history of the background. Tjoneslo (talk) 06:30, 17 June 2020 (EDT)
- Yes. Those belong together. Little steps make bigger (complex) jobs smaller (manageable). I’ll start with the policy recommendation. —¿philoserf? (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2020 (EDT)