Difference between revisions of "Forum:Northstar (world) vs. Northstar (system)"

From Traveller Wiki - Science-Fiction Adventure in the Far future
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> In the Paranoia Press version of Beyond, the [[Northsta...)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
In the Paranoia Press version of [[Beyond]], the [[Northstar (world)]] is a [[ringworld]]. When I copied the data into the Wiki for this article, I decided that Northstar belongs as a [[Northstar (system)]] article, not a (world) article. The UWP doesn't handle ringworlds, or Dyson spheres, or other such weird structures. And the Ringworld isn't really a world. So I'm putting this up for discussion. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] 02:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 
In the Paranoia Press version of [[Beyond]], the [[Northstar (world)]] is a [[ringworld]]. When I copied the data into the Wiki for this article, I decided that Northstar belongs as a [[Northstar (system)]] article, not a (world) article. The UWP doesn't handle ringworlds, or Dyson spheres, or other such weird structures. And the Ringworld isn't really a world. So I'm putting this up for discussion. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] 02:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
:The system was originally intended to detail all the planets in a system, as opposed to the single main world that a world article deals with.
 +
:For ring worlds one would might assume that there are no other worlds in the system in any case but that should not make much of a difference, there are several single world systems. If the UWP doesn't handle ringworlds then we need to either adjust the UWP, or use a different template. An asteroid belt is somewhat similar to a ringworld (a lot of settlements spread out in an entire orbit), so I think we should still use the (world) page. [[User:Dcorrin|Dcorrin]] 15:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:50, 14 February 2008

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Northstar (world) vs. Northstar (system)



In the Paranoia Press version of Beyond, the Northstar (world) is a ringworld. When I copied the data into the Wiki for this article, I decided that Northstar belongs as a Northstar (system) article, not a (world) article. The UWP doesn't handle ringworlds, or Dyson spheres, or other such weird structures. And the Ringworld isn't really a world. So I'm putting this up for discussion. Tjoneslo 02:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The system was originally intended to detail all the planets in a system, as opposed to the single main world that a world article deals with.
For ring worlds one would might assume that there are no other worlds in the system in any case but that should not make much of a difference, there are several single world systems. If the UWP doesn't handle ringworlds then we need to either adjust the UWP, or use a different template. An asteroid belt is somewhat similar to a ringworld (a lot of settlements spread out in an entire orbit), so I think we should still use the (world) page. Dcorrin 15:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)