Forum:Nobility template on every world page

From Traveller Wiki - Science-Fiction Adventure in the Far future
Revision as of 20:51, 21 May 2017 by Tjoneslo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> This was copied from Talk:Akigir (world)...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Nobility template on every world page



This was copied from Talk:Akigir (world) to ensure a wider public discussion.

Thomas, the nobility box is duplicated by what you do (Advanced URL & data data statistics for T5SS), but it is important for Wayne and others so they can enter in extra nobility data.
Is it possible for you to not delete this information or for all of us, as in the wiki team, to discuss it?
Seriously, not my pet peeve, designed and implemented for others... including by Marc's request as part of future nobility plans.
- Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2017 (EDT)
The respect for the content and layout of articles goes both ways. I assert that if Wayne or any of the other wiki editors wanted to add content to an article, they are fully capable of adding the correct headers at this same time. And that the Manual of Style/world exists for this exact reason.
I am also strongly of the belief that the Template: Imperial Nobility, Template: Starport, Template: World Tech, and Template: WorldGov should not be added to every single world article. I'm even thinking about replacing the Imperial Nobility template in the StellarDataQuery.
There should instead be longer, more comprehensive, articles on each of the settings for these template values, with links from the world articles. These links should be both from the UWP and StellarDataQuery templates (i.e. in the infobox) and in the main article text; either from the header information or the other article information or both.
Finally, based upon my review of the changes I made the Akigir article, I would say the removal of the Imperial Nobility template and the header was accidental, not intentional. So thank you for having a discussion about these changes. Let's work some more on what the correct and appropriate layout for these articles should be. Tjoneslo (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2017 (EDT)