Difference between revisions of "Forum:Nobility template on every world page"

From Traveller Wiki - Science-Fiction Adventure in the Far future
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> This was copied from Talk:Akigir (world)...")
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
:: There should instead be longer, more comprehensive, articles on each of the settings for these template values, with links from the world articles. These links should be both from the UWP and StellarDataQuery templates (i.e. in the infobox) and in the main article text; either from the header information or the other article information or both.  
 
:: There should instead be longer, more comprehensive, articles on each of the settings for these template values, with links from the world articles. These links should be both from the UWP and StellarDataQuery templates (i.e. in the infobox) and in the main article text; either from the header information or the other article information or both.  
 
:: Finally, based upon my review of the changes I made the Akigir article, I would say the removal of the Imperial Nobility template and the header was accidental, not intentional. So thank you for having a discussion about these changes. Let's work some more on what the correct and appropriate layout for these articles should be. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 16:51, 21 May 2017 (EDT)
 
:: Finally, based upon my review of the changes I made the Akigir article, I would say the removal of the Imperial Nobility template and the header was accidental, not intentional. So thank you for having a discussion about these changes. Let's work some more on what the correct and appropriate layout for these articles should be. [[User:Tjoneslo|Tjoneslo]] ([[User talk:Tjoneslo|talk]]) 16:51, 21 May 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Maybe I am getting ready to show my age here, ages ago the conservation of space was at a premium (data-space in your RAM as well as transfer speed through your MODEM) due to the high cost of those micro-circuits. These days RAM and such are ridiculously inexpensive. The limitations of RAM and transfer speeds appear to have been pushed to the far back burner. But why should we burden those highways and parking lots with all the traffic?
 +
:That being said, I still see no reason to duplicate information on the same page, or copy info from one page to the next without elaboration.  Take the entry on the starport, you can get that – as well as comparisons from one to the other – on the starport page; I see no need to copy (ok, “template” it) onto the world page. The same can be said for [[Template: Imperial Nobility]], [[Template: World Tech]], and [[Template: WorldGov]] unless there is a level of detail unique to that world to make it different enough to detail.
 +
:At that point, the template in use is really irrelevant, because you no longer have a tech level 9 world, but a tech level 9 (interstellar travel) and tech level 16 genetic engineering entry….. a rather unique entry that precludes the template style. [[User:Ssteve|Ssteve]] ([[User talk:Ssteve|talk]]) 10:26, 22 May 2017 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:26, 22 May 2017

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Nobility template on every world page



This was copied from Talk:Akigir (world) to ensure a wider public discussion.

Thomas, the nobility box is duplicated by what you do (Advanced URL & data data statistics for T5SS), but it is important for Wayne and others so they can enter in extra nobility data.
Is it possible for you to not delete this information or for all of us, as in the wiki team, to discuss it?
Seriously, not my pet peeve, designed and implemented for others... including by Marc's request as part of future nobility plans.
- Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2017 (EDT)
The respect for the content and layout of articles goes both ways. I assert that if Wayne or any of the other wiki editors wanted to add content to an article, they are fully capable of adding the correct headers at this same time. And that the Manual of Style/world exists for this exact reason.
I am also strongly of the belief that the Template: Imperial Nobility, Template: Starport, Template: World Tech, and Template: WorldGov should not be added to every single world article. I'm even thinking about replacing the Imperial Nobility template in the StellarDataQuery.
There should instead be longer, more comprehensive, articles on each of the settings for these template values, with links from the world articles. These links should be both from the UWP and StellarDataQuery templates (i.e. in the infobox) and in the main article text; either from the header information or the other article information or both.
Finally, based upon my review of the changes I made the Akigir article, I would say the removal of the Imperial Nobility template and the header was accidental, not intentional. So thank you for having a discussion about these changes. Let's work some more on what the correct and appropriate layout for these articles should be. Tjoneslo (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2017 (EDT)
Maybe I am getting ready to show my age here, ages ago the conservation of space was at a premium (data-space in your RAM as well as transfer speed through your MODEM) due to the high cost of those micro-circuits. These days RAM and such are ridiculously inexpensive. The limitations of RAM and transfer speeds appear to have been pushed to the far back burner. But why should we burden those highways and parking lots with all the traffic?
That being said, I still see no reason to duplicate information on the same page, or copy info from one page to the next without elaboration. Take the entry on the starport, you can get that – as well as comparisons from one to the other – on the starport page; I see no need to copy (ok, “template” it) onto the world page. The same can be said for Template: Imperial Nobility, Template: World Tech, and Template: WorldGov unless there is a level of detail unique to that world to make it different enough to detail.
At that point, the template in use is really irrelevant, because you no longer have a tech level 9 world, but a tech level 9 (interstellar travel) and tech level 16 genetic engineering entry….. a rather unique entry that precludes the template style. Ssteve (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2017 (EDT)