Editing Forum:Expanded UWP (2017)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: - [[User:Maksim-Smelchak|Maksim-Smelchak]] ([[User talk:Maksim-Smelchak|talk]]) 19:21, 19 March 2017 (EDT) | : - [[User:Maksim-Smelchak|Maksim-Smelchak]] ([[User talk:Maksim-Smelchak|talk]]) 19:21, 19 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
− | |||
:: This is an old debate, with no consensus about how to resolve it. I view the text of the write-up for the world as more important than the generated infoboxes. So my approach focuses on this text, and relegates the infoboxes, and other generated text (e.g. [[Template:Starport]] and [[Template:Imperial Nobility]]) to secondary importance. | :: This is an old debate, with no consensus about how to resolve it. I view the text of the write-up for the world as more important than the generated infoboxes. So my approach focuses on this text, and relegates the infoboxes, and other generated text (e.g. [[Template:Starport]] and [[Template:Imperial Nobility]]) to secondary importance. | ||
:: The [[Manual of Style/sector]] and [[Manual of Style/subsector]] advanced layouts have one approach to splitting the History and Background section by era. Is this sufficient? | :: The [[Manual of Style/sector]] and [[Manual of Style/subsector]] advanced layouts have one approach to splitting the History and Background section by era. Is this sufficient? |