Difference between revisions of "Forum:Criticism of the wiki"

From Traveller Wiki - Science-Fiction Adventure in the Far future
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* But, hey,  it's a resource... Anyone can pull out of it what they will...
 
* But, hey,  it's a resource... Anyone can pull out of it what they will...
 
* I like Shawn and it's no big deal. I can drop him a line and take in feedback from him.  
 
* I like Shawn and it's no big deal. I can drop him a line and take in feedback from him.  
 +
* Thanks BeRKA!
 
: -
 
: -

Revision as of 12:16, 12 October 2019

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Criticism of the wiki



Notes (2019)

I think the wiki is great and that you all do a great job here and that the wiki is a great resource.

But not everyone thinks so. Listen to this. Jump to 7:28 to hear an opinion about the wiki:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ECgI-PeQ2w

BeRKA (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2019 (EDT)


No big deal. Many fans have impressions of it from a decade or more ago and have never checked back since. In many cases, there simply isn't data to populate many articles because it has never been written. So, he makes a fair point.

  • On the other hand, how can we evaluate how much a near limitless, imaginary world is done? 2% is kind of a nebulous estimate in that regard.
  • Others have said the same thing before. Regardless of their approval or disapproval, the development team pushes forward.
  • What the critics are missing is that there are now numerous treasures found in the wiki's articles including some of the most complete and well developed articles ever written about Traveller.
  • But, hey, it's a resource... Anyone can pull out of it what they will...
  • I like Shawn and it's no big deal. I can drop him a line and take in feedback from him.
  • Thanks BeRKA!
-