Forum:Articles covering different eras
This is a long rant/discussion about the need to have a policy about making overlapping or very specific articles identified approprately. The challenge is as follows:
Traveller is a game of secrets. Or at least, that is one of its attractors. A prime example is the secret of the Ancients. It would be nice to include the secrets in the wiki, but keep the secrets, well secret. That is not part of the original article, but still easy to find.
Traveller also covers eight official milieu's (Interstellar wars, Milieu 0, Milieu 990 (for T20), Milieu 1116 (for Classic Traveller), Milieu 1120 (for GURPS), Rebellion, The New Era, and Fourth Imperium), plus others from various non-canon campaigns. In some cases the article may be split year-to-year based upon changes.
There is also the topic of canon vs. non-canon information about the same topic. The original canon article was a short paragraph or two, followed by a much longer writeup by another non-canon source. Or two conflicting sources of writeups, where we would like to keep both.
I've also had two requests to include alternate Traveller Universe information within the wiki. Information which is close to, but not in the same, universe as the Third Imperium.
Another challenge is I would like to keep as much of the Meta-Game information out of the articles as possible. That is, I don't want to include "GURPS Timeline" or "T20 Era" or similar information in the article title or body as much as is possible.
Thus far there has been a scattershot manner of dealing with these issues. I would like to have a consistent, and agreed upon, way of doing this.
There are two ways of implementing Article marking if an article requires notation that it belongs in a specific place. First is use of categories. The Canon and Non-canon categories are a prime example of this. There is also the Library and Dictonary. If an articles is written specifically for a single milieu, contains the secret information, or written for meta-game information, it should include the appropriate categories. Many of these categories already exist, I will suggest a naming policy when I think of one.
Second is to add identifiers to the title of the article. For example the base article is "Imperialines" and the secrets article would be "Imperialines (GM)". I'd like to suggest instead to use a "/" with this (e.g. "Imperialines/GM"). The reason for using the sub-page method is the wiki processor helpfully (and automatically) includes a link back to the base article. This means less work for us to maintain links between articles. Similar to the categories, I'd like to propose a specific set of sub-pages to cover most of the issues we've seen so far.
Summary: Where articles are specific to an era, meta-game issue, or have overlapping and conflicting information, we need to consistenly mark them.
- There will be a specific category to include for each of these type (and set) of articles. We need a (suggested) list.
- Conflicting or overlapping articles will be included using a sub-page (e.g. article titles will be "Main Article/Specific Article"). Is this an acceptable idea?
- It would be nice to have a 90% list of Specific Article titles to cover the expected ideas we need to create items for.
Feedback Appreciated.
Tjoneslo 17:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)