Editing Efficiency
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Description ([[Specifications]]) == | == Description ([[Specifications]]) == | ||
− | [[Efficiency]] reflects the current economic system, and includes sensible legal procedures, appropriate tariffs, customs promoting a balanced work ethic, rewards for merit, and social structures which match ability and job. | + | [[Efficiency]] reflects the current economic system, and includes sensible legal procedures, appropriate tariffs, customs promoting a balanced work ethic, rewards for merit, and social structures which match ability and job. Negative Efficiency is worse. Efficiency at -1 or less turn the RUs available negative: the Inefficiencies are so destructive as to make the economy a net drain. Such barriers represent a welfare state; cultural influences which do not value wealth, even physical limitations. On the other hand, since some economies have positive efficiencies: positive multipliers increasing available RU. |
− | |||
− | Negative Efficiency is worse. Efficiency at -1 or less turn the | ||
− | |||
− | On the other hand, since some economies have positive efficiencies: positive multipliers increasing available | ||
== History & Background ([[Dossier]]) == | == History & Background ([[Dossier]]) == |