Talk:Zarushagar Sector

User:Tjoneslo, Why does the "SectorWorlds2" center right on this page? Thanks. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2015 (EDT)

It just looks that way because of the layout of the object on the page. The Zoomed out view of the surrounding sectors is left aligned in the space which is wider than the image is. So you eye thinks the right side of the image is the right side of the page, but there is a set of white space between the right side of the image and the right side of the page. This makes the {{SectorWorld2}} template look unbalanced on the page. The problem here is the size of the {{InfoboxSector}} isn't fixed, it's largely determined by the width of the subsector names. It also might help if the lower image was centered in the table. Tjoneslo (talk) 08:14, 7 June 2015 (EDT)

Thank you,. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2015 (EDT)

So what is the extra world in this sector? Summary says 496, but worlds template says: 497. I know why the Spinward Marches Sector is wrong, but why this one? Tjoneslo (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2015 (EDT)

I will check and see what I can find. It may be awhile (...perhaps a few days) as I have other obligations today than the Traveller Wiki... Thank you for all of your help. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2015 (EDT)

Thinking about, I think there is a non-canon world in the blend. I am still checking. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 11:07, 18 June 2015 (EDT)

I had a quick look, things may be a bit more complicated than a single world extra. Zarushagar Sector/data and Zarushagar Sector/world list differ considerably. I'm assuming the data page is more up to date. The first world that looked odd alphabetically in the Worlds in the Sector was Agamemnon, because that isn't listed in the Zarushagar Sector/data. I then looked at the planet entry which says it is in Gaussi Subsector. I looked in Gaussi, and that has at least three worlds that are not on the Zarushagar Sector/data. Agamemnon, Australia, and Isfahan. the data page doesn't list anything at their purported locations, so it probably isn't a case of name changes.

So it looks like there could be a number of worlds that are wrong and a number that don't have entries yet. OGuutan (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2015 (EDT)

Hi Peter AKA OGuutan. T5SS is the only canon source and the most recently reviewed source. Zarushagar Sector/data and Zarushagar Sector/world list are older sources and full of fanon and non-canon worlds, especially the world list. When in doubt, default to T5SS. I don't consult the world list much since it's almost always far out of date and full of non-canon and non T5SS worlds. Just something to consider... Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2015 (EDT)

The Zarushagar Sector/data is the same as http://travellermap.com/data/Zarushagar, and both contain internal labels as T5SS and are dated 2015-05-04, which is why I used that list as the comparison page and not the Zarushagar Sector/world list, which must be wrong. OGuutan (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2015 (EDT)